R. v. Wagar (2017), 36 C.R. (7th) 30, 2017 ABPC 17, 2017 CarswellAlta 180, 47 Alta. L.R. (6th) 356 (Alta. Prov. Ct.) at para. 20 LeGrandeur A.C.J. Prov. Ct.)
No warning was required before striking pleading since plaintiff failed to comply with directions and orders and failed to provide a reasonable excuse for-non-compliance
Possession of cheque did not allow neighbour to bring action for its value
Wetsch v. Kuski (2017), 2017 SKCA 77, 2017 CarswellSask 483 (Sask. C.A.)
See what was discussed at The Emerging Legal Technology Forum held in Calgary on Tuesday, October 26, 2017.
Industry change leaders and practitioners came together for the Emerging Legal Technology forum in Vancouver on October 23. See what they discussed.
Choquette v. Viczko (2017), 2017 CarswellSask 350, 2017 SKQB 191 (Sask. Q.B.)
Motion judge held that to allow husband to accept clauses that financially benefitted him and require wife to litigate all other clauses would be blatantly unfair
The Emerging Legal Technology Forum in Halifax, brought together local industry change leaders and practitioners to talk about legal technology and it’s impact on the legal industry. See what was discussed.
We're happy to announce that our Thomson Reuters Technology Centre has found its permanent home on Duncan Street in Toronto.
S. (S.K.) v. B. (T.L.) (2017), 2017 CarswellBC 1245, 2017 BCPC 134 (B.C. Prov. Ct.)
Presumption of destruction with intention to revoke can be rebutted by evidence showing on balance of probabilities that testatrix did not destroy will or intend to revoke it