Legal Insight - Current news, cases, and ideas affecting law and practice

Recent Posts

[The judge] must consider whether [the plaintiff] has standing to bring an application under Rule 16-46 [of the Queen's Bench Rules], to require proof of the will in solemn form, or for an order revoking the grant of probate under Rule 16-47. . . . . . Rule 16-46 ... permits an application by any person who “... is or may be interested in the estate.” The grammatical and ordinary meaning of the word “may” in Rule 16-46 connotes possibility ... the use of the phrase “may be interested” means that a person does not have to establish a definite interest in the estate to establish standing. A possible interest, within the context of the applicable law and the specific factual circumstances, is enough to ground standing.

READ MORE »

Employer dismissed employee without appropriate consideration and investigation; Employer did not show conduct incompatible with employee's duties which went to root of contract

READ MORE »

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal in Callidus Capital Corporation v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2018 SCC 47, on November 8, 2018.

READ MORE »

In the deceased's will, he only left his wife a life estate in his share of a condominium. The deceased's children were made his attorneys through a power of attorney. The children were beneficiaries, and one of them was executor. The wife, through her daughter as litigation guardian (applicant), brought an unsuccessful application for an accounting and equalization under Pt. IV of Family Property Act. An appeal was filed and dismissed. The court held that the applicant was not entitled as of a right to an accounting before a master. The applicant was entitled to an accounting, which occurred before applications judge.

READ MORE »

... what is referred to as “bootstrapping.” This is the situation where a party seeks to supplement what would otherwise be considered deficient evidence with allegedly “new” evidence and arguments on appeal.

READ MORE »

This excerpt from the updated Family Law — Property title examines Canadian law with regards to unjust enrichment and the presumptions of advancement and resulting trust

READ MORE »

If bankrupt could challenge validity of entire bankruptcy proceedings at this late stage, it would amount to collateral attack on validity of initial bankruptcy order, which was properly made and upheld upon appeal — This would be contrary to concept of finality ensconced in doctrines of res judicata and abuse of process.

READ MORE »

What is the GDPR and Why Should Canadian Businesses be Concerned with it?

The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) is an EU regulation governing the protection of personal data of EU residents. So why does this EU legislation matter to Canadian businesses and organizations?

READ MORE »

Your best work just got better: “Browse Legal Topics” to learn about a new practice area

WestlawNext Canada is now fully integrated with ProView eLooseleafs and Practical Law Canada know-how. In one place, you can search and browse all the case law, legislation, commentary, practice notes, and annotated precedents you need to do your best work. More focus, less legwork. It’s time well spent.

READ MORE »

Clubine v. Paniagua [2018 CarswellBC 1798 (B.C. S.C.)] examines the effect of “After The Event Insurance”, or “Adverse Costs Insurance” on costs awards in British Columbia. ATE insurance is coverage purchased for the specific purpose of indemnifying the insured against expenses related to litigation itself. Often the policies are purchased after the event that is the subject of the litigation (such as an automobile accident) has occurred.

READ MORE »

As with any trust, a valid will must satisfy the “three certainties”: certainty of intent to create the trust, certainty as to the subject-matter or property committed to the trust and certainty as to the objects of the trust or the purposes to which the property is to be applied.

READ MORE »

Employee filed complaint under Employment Standards Code for vacation pay and holiday pay; employer contended that "vacation pay" in agreement also included holiday pay; umpire found this inconsistent with employer's obligations to keep records and provide written statement separating out vacation and holiday pay under Code

READ MORE »

Page 1 of 76