Summary of recent Alberta case in which claim was made that a lawyer needed to take instruction from both the husband and wife to complete a transaction.
Recent appeal case finds that former employee did not fail to mitigate damages by rejecting offers of re-employment when trust and confidence was eroded.
Recent decision on what constitutes a marriage-like relationship, thus making property division and spousal support issues.
R. v. Campbell | 1972 CarswellAlta 125 | Alberta District Court
The Supreme Court of Canada has instructed that, "[t]he primary interpretive principle is that when the language of the policy is unambiguous, the court should give effect to clear language, reading the contract as a whole.
This post describes the procedures a person seeking access to records under freedom of information laws must follow in each jurisdiction in Canada.
Interesting case from Newfoundland in which the defendant claims infringement of his fair trial rights because courthouse was named after personal plaintiff.
R. c. McRae | 2013 CarswellQue 11604 | Supreme Court of Canada
This motion highlights the relative sanctity of a consent order.
Recent decision which permitted a mother to bring her son on a temporary visit to a Hague Convention signatory
In Apple v. Samsung, the United States Court of Appeals clarified and applied the causal nexus requirement in a situation involving irreparable harm.
Doncaster v. Field | 2013 CarswellNS 990 | Nova Scotia Court of Appeal